Fri
Dec
05

BarCamp News Innovation in Philadelphia, an update.

Cosby thinks this is a good idea, and you should too.

Cosby thinks this is a good idea, and you should too.

The last post on this blog outlined reasons I think Barcamp: News Innovation should be in Philadelphia.  A few people agreed with me, a few did not.  However, people agreeing with me does not magically bring the event to Philadelphia.

After shooting a few emails around I can tell everyone this:

  • Temple University’s School of Communications has agreed in principle to host the event.  This is good news as projectors, wifi, and other technology would be readily available.  Temple University is also located right off of the Broad Street subway line, so it is highly accesable from anywhere in the city.  If it was held at Temple, it would most likely be on the weekend as to not interfere with classes.
  • Chris Krewson at the Philadelphia Inquirer, offered the facilities there as well, and offered to do his best to provide speakers from the Inky.  The Inquirer building is so close to Temple that you can see it, so it is possible to have a few events at each.
  • Philly tech event planner experts at P’unk Ave have agreed at the very least to lend general support with more specifics available as details emerge.

So a BarCamp Philly has general support from the three pillars of Journalism innovation: the education community, the online journalist community, and the tech community.  Various students, reporters, tech people, and educators have contacted me in private to offer a show of support.

So, the next step would be to have a degree of certainty that this event is happening. This is something I can’t accomplish on my own so I have set up the offical Philadelphia wiki page.  It is bare bones now, but if you have any interest in this happening, even if it is a casual “I’d go” please drop by and leave a comment.

Hopefully this can fill out over the weekend, and thank you everyone who has offered support.

Wed
Dec
03

Why BarCamp News Innovation should be in Philadelphia

Above: Sean's new job.  Courtesy of Flickr user: rjbechtel66.

Above: Sean's new job

I’ll admit it, I have been out of the loop lately.  That’s why I missed the recent conversation spreading across the Web about the proposed BarCamp: News Innovation.  That is, until my buddy Christopher Wink clued me into the tragedy that was occurring.

If you missed it, a bunch of people way smarter than myself are looking to organize a forum for getting forward thinking media-people together to discuss the future of news.  I agree with the concept, but what I disagree with are the proposed locations.  There is only one place this could possibly go down: Philadelphia.

Why?

Location Location Location. Whenever any group proposes any kind of big event, there is usually a tug of war between New York City and Washington D.C. This never made any sense to me, as Philadelphia is right in between these two locations.

On the Barcamp Wiki, DC and Boston area is proposed as one location.  This is lunacy.  Philadelphia is in the center of the corridor of Northeastern cities being less than a two hour drive from every major city except Boston.  Having the event in DC and Miami, totally alienates everyone north of the capital.  Having the event Boston increases the travel time for those coming from D.C.

Media Market. Aside from the central location, Philadelphia is the forth largest media market in the country, and second largest on the East Coast.  The other proposed locations?  Miami is 6th, D.C. is 7th, and Boston is 11th.  Philadelphia is the 6th largest city in the country (and it would be ranked higher if Phoenix and Houston didn’t have FOUR TIMES the square mileage Philadelphia does).  Miami and Boston don’t even crack the top 20.

Burgeoning tech scene. We’ve all heard ad nauseum how “with it” Silicon Valley and New York City are.  We don’t need another insidery gathering in cities known for their insidery gatherings.  This event is about fresh faces and fresh ideas.  And, as luck would have it, Philadelphia is currently in the midst of a tech explosion.  As Indy Hall co-founder Alex Hillman put it, a few years ago there were hardly any tech related events in the City of Brotherly Love.  Now?  Ignites, Barcamps, and Juntos are fostering a tech community like no where else.  Groups such as the Hacktory, Make: Philly, P’unk Ave, and Indy Hall are leading the way, featuring the wonderful technology related events and people that live here.  And these communities aren’t just Web 2.0. Or design. Or journalism.  They’re cross-genre.  Junto is even having a dialog with local nerds on health care this Thursday.  Health care! A similar dialog on Journalism would get a wonderful turnout full of fresh faces.

Philly has talent. Philadelphia is one of the few remaining two paper towns.  However, both the Philadelphia Daily News and the Philadelphia Inquirer have been shrinking rapidly.  This means there is still a large amount of very qualified journalists floating around (maybe in the old Pen and Pencil club?), many of whom might be interested in this conference. And these ex-deadtree reporters are up to some wonderful things.  For example, TreeHouse Media was started by an ex-Inquirer staffer.  The Multimedia Urban Reporting Lab at Temple University was founded by an Philly ex-broadcaster.

The availability of venues.  Temple University, The University of the Sciences, LaSalle University, Drexel University and The University of Pennslyvania are just a few of the colleges all located within blocks of Center City.  Plus, The Pennsylvania Convention Center is being expanded … again.

Anyone who disagrees with me is welcome to drop me a line here or on Twitter, but I can not think of a more convenient and better equipped location that Philadelphia.  Miami (sorry Mr. Linch), Boston, and New York all lack the essential aspects of an event like this: a central location, an underserved community, and the facilities to handle this.

And if you live in Philly and would like this to happen, drop a note on the BarCamp wiki.  Cmon, Why Cant Us?

Wed
Nov
19

Introducing the new CW

You may recall that a few months ago I released a little side project named “Consumer Whore”.  CW is a shopping blog that features one cool item to buy every day.  The difference from most shopping blogs is that while most other sites in the genre feature items that are four figures or are not available to buy yet, I only feature items that can be purchased right now.  And for cheap.

It’s been dead for a few weeks as I traveled Europe, but it’s time to awaken the beast.  I missed browsing around my RSS feeds and discover tons of great stuff, and I couldn’t wait to start again.

So when I wasn’t sending off resumes and cover letters this week, I have been tinkering with CW and it’s new custom Wordpress theme.

So what’s different?

Money

Well, for starters, this will be my second site ever that I have attempted to monetize (the first being College v2).  I plan on doing this with the usual mix of Text Link Ads and Google Adsense.   However, the real strategy I’m testing on this site is the use of affiliate links.  Usually, after finding an item I’d like to feature, I check if the retailer has an affiliate program.  If it doesn’t, no big deal. But if it does, I link to the item using the affiliate link.

I’m willing to bet that if a blogger builds trust, the reader could care less if the blogger is making money.  In fact, as long as the content is not dictated by the advertising, they may prefer it that way.  A fine line I know, but it’s a theory I’m excited to test and one that I will certainly document on this blog.

Design

The design has received a complete makeover.  I’m trying to take Barack Obama’s advice and stick to this style of design for CW for the years to come.  The goal was to make browsing items easy, and even fun.  I also wanted the item of the day to jump out when you first load the front page.

This design was also my first time using multiple loops on a Wordpress theme (one for the item of the day, one for the tabs).  The tabs were done using the tabber script, and the banner is from this Smashing Magazine post.  Also, many thanks to wordpress forum user mores for his custom php thumbnail function.

I’m certainly open to any criticism out there.  I’ve been debating whether there are too many thumbnails, or if the tabs are too big, so any input in that regard will be rewarded with candy and general good will.  In fact, if you told me one thing that sucked about it, you’d be doing me a huge favor.

So go poke around and if you really like it, subscribe.

Tue
Nov
18

How to design like Barack Obama: control, consistency and change.

No matter where your political allegiances are, it is hard to not respect the kind of campaign Barack Obama ran.

Obama’s campaign embraced the Internet more than any other candidate since Howard Dean.  Except, you know, Obama won.  What Obama did better than any before him was to utilize a team of designers that polished his brand on the Web, in print, and on “hope” posters all over the country.  Below are some trends I noticed used in his time as a candidate and president elect, with notes on how it can help the average designer.

Gotham Font

Usually when you see a political rally on television, the members of the audience are waving signs, flags, and anything else they can get their hands on to show their support for their candidate.  In most cases, the signs are a mix and match of different groups, slogans, and interests.

Most rallies feature a mix of fonts and colors on signs

Most rallies feature a mix of fonts and colors on signs

For Obama, the crowd was frighteningly uniform in it’s signage that utilized the light blues he came to be known for and the Gotham Black font.

This was a common sight at Obama rallies.  Yeah Gotham!

This was a common sight at Obama rallies. Yeah Gotham!

But the font crossed over from political signs.  It was used on those now infamous “hope” posters, and it is heavily used in Obama’s web presence as well.  The font has become so synonymous with the president elect that I showed a friend a site design I was working on, and she immediately recognized Gotham as Obama’s font of choice.

This was the main image on Obama's campaign site.

This was the main image on Obama. See the Gotham?

Originally created for GQ by Jonathan Hoefler and Tobias Frere-Jones, the Gotham font was meant to be masculine and fresh, which aren’t bad adjectives for a political campaign.  If you are interested, the makers of Helvetica interviewed the creators about their thought process when setting the typeface.  But what regular designers can learn from Obama is not only his font selection, but the discipline to create a design and stick to it, much like good politicians stay on message.

If you’d like the font, you’re going to have to pony up $70. A small fee for all you future presidents.

Colors

One of Obama’s goals was to make the electoral map a bluer shade, a color that Obama utilized quite nicely in his materials.  There was the occasional red sign used for contrast, but throughout all of his materials Obama stuck to a collection of blues.  I rooted through the CSS file of his site, and found the colors below.  If you use Photoshop, I made a color swatch for your designing pleasure.  Keep in mind that if you have the “Use Web-Safe colors” option checked it may slightly alter their shade.

These colors were not only used in his Internet marketing, but in posters, campaign signs and buttons.  Obama even used the colors for his presidential seal.

As you can see, there was a mix of softer blues for the gentler messages and signs, and the darker colors to increase the impact on harder hitting messages.

The Big O

The Obama brand, just like any other, relied heavily on an easily recognizable logo.  The ubiquitous “O” uses the colors mentioned above and is both the first letter of Obama’s last name and a 4-color picture of a rising (or setting) sun over an American farm.

So what are designers to learn?  Well besides from having the right mix of clean design and subliminal messaging, the logo was one of the few Obama campaign materials to be customized to fit the situation.  On the official campaign Web site, Obama offered several version of the logo based on different interest groups:

This curtailed the use of custom signs, yet allowed each group to express their support.  A sort of keeping everyone on the same page no matter what their individual interests are, and at the same time controlling the message.  Because these logos were offered on the campaign Web site, they could even keep statistics on what groups were more active.

If you think to other corporate identities, there are often many variations of the same logo.  Nike logos are often seen in different colors, Pepsi switches theirs from time to time, and Google loves to doodle on theirs.

Obama as messiah

Obama’s image was tightly controlled on all fronts.  When rumors started to spread about his religion and heritage, the campaign immediately spring into action with a “Fight the Smears” Web site.  The same degree of control was used in any photographs / posters of the candidate.

In most of the official campaign imagery, he is seen looking upward with a heavenly glow that suggests not only will he be a good president, he may rise from the dead on the third day.  It is not often he looks directly at the camera, which may be perceived as threatening.  The one exception may have been in his TV advertisements when directly spoke to the camera as if he was in a conversation with the viewer.  This stylistic choice may have added to the criticisms of elitism and aloofness, but mostly it made him appear as a larger-than-life figure capable of great things.  And to someone who was criticized on their lack of experience, this undoubtedly proved an asset.

The Quote

On the top of each of his Web sites, Obama places the name to left and a quote to the right.

The quote allows the reader to not only know what the Web site is about, but to get the stance of Obama as well.  This tactic of banner / slogan may be nothing new, but it cultivates the brand of Obama to get a message directly from the candidate.  The quote gives the reader the illusion that Obama is directly involved with everything you are reading and makes it appear less like the efforts of a monolithic campaign machine and more like his personal blog.

The Glow

Obama may just be our first president who doesn’t need electricity at The White House.  All of his sites place a glowing effect around the container, and images of him are often given that subtle warm aura.  The advantages are similar to the tactic of never having Obama look directly in the camera.  It softens his image and make him appear larger than life.

This technique is done by making a background image that outlines the container.  The one used for change.gov, for example, is below:

His slogan “Change” never changed.

McCain often switched between “Country First” “Maverick” and a few other slogans, but Obama never budged from his “Change” message.  McCain even did some generous slogan borrowing at one point.  But, much like the strict adherence to Gotham, the message was always the same.

In the design/media world, the lesson may be that continually doing overhauls to your Web site or logo may water down your brand.  Do a little more work up front to ensure that you stay on message.  After all, when someone reads your Web site they are putting stock in what you have to say, and casting a  “vote” for you with their time.

Sat
Nov
08

Lessons learned from podcasting, and time to start “real life”

From left: Christopher Wink, Brian Blanda, Sean Blanda at the Eiffel Tower

From left: Christopher Wink, Brian Blanda, Sean Blanda at the Eiffel Tower

So, that was fun.

If you have noticed the lack of posting around here, it is because my friend Chris Wink and I have been traveling Europe while podcasting our advice along the way over at We Dont Speak the Language.  Im back now, and if you are looking for some sort of summary of the trip, head on over the WDSTL (the last episode will be released on Sunday).  However, I’d guess if you are reading this blog you are more concerned about media and behind the scenes aspects of the podcast.

This was my first experience with any sort of video podcast, as well as the greatest test of my ability to produce content under a wide range of circumstances.  I’ve written posts in London train stations, filmed an episode in a Eurail train, and co-interviewed a former prostitute in Amsterdam.  While I would be lying if I said I mastered the art of the video podcast, here are a few lessons I can pass on to anyone considering something similar:

Promote, promote, promote. Initially we sent out a mass email to those in our contact lists that we thought were interested.  We also created pages on multiple social networks.  This wasn’t anywhere near enough promotion.  In reality, for every three posts we wrote we should have sent an email to a travel blog.  We should have left comments on other blogs.  We should have hung a billboard on Philadelphia City Hall if we had to.  This is not to say we were unhappy with our numbers.  I cannot speak for Chris, but our hits and subscribers were right around where I thought they’d be.  I was happy with the comments left as well.  However, after about two weeks on the road, the numbers stayed relatively flat.  Had we been more active in promotion our numbers may have been better.

I severely underestimated the work needed to grow an audience in the short term.  Most projects I have had were long term in scope and, foolishly, I was never in a rush to attract hoards of viewers.  I was big believer in getting the ball rolling and then letting traffic grow organically.  But WDSTL taught me that your promoting to content creation ratio should be somewhere around 25/75.

You need tons of hard drive space. According to the “WDSTL” folder on my external hard drive we created just under 30 gigs of content.  Additionally, when editing video you need a large portion of your hard drive available as a scratch disk.  Luckily, Wink had a laptop with a decent amount of space and I lugged along an external hard drive.  As a rule, I’d say each minute of video you wish to produce in your episode you need at least a gig.  Sounds obvious, but the first time I received the “out of disc memory” warning it blindsided me.

Carpe Wifi. The odd thing about trying to maintain an Internet property on the road is that you, um, need the Internet.  The hostels we were staying in often had shoddy connections, if they had one at at all. And when you are uploading video that can be as big as several hundred megabytes, a bogus connection can slow you down for hours.  An alternative was to pay as much as $3 every half hour for Internet access at a cafe. I once was so desperate that I walked the streets in Hungary at 11 p.m. with a laptop in hand trying to mooch off of a open wifi connection.

So whenever we found a reliable and fast connection we stopped and uploaded all of the video we could.  Sometimes this caused us to delay our plans, but mostly it was a matter of seizing the great wifi while we could, because we never knew when we would get another chance.

You can produce a decent looking podcast with a digital camera.  We produced all of our video using a Nikon Coolpix s210 camera.  It produced 640 x 480 video that was more than good enough to be played on a computer screen.

Seriously, our tripod saved our lives. We didn’t have a camera man after my brother Brian went home, but our trusty bendy tripod usually fit the role just fine.  To learn about all of our equipment used, check out the WDSTL post.

Being on camera is tough. Aside from once presenting a business plan and speaking at CMA, I have very little public speaking experience.  Although, I was once conned into doing our high school play (I was Kili the dwarf in “The Hobbit” thank you very much).   Being on camera and constantly rewatching myself as I was editing forced me to pick up on my verbal and physical ticks.  Ticks such as talking too fast, using certain phrases repetitively, and not speaking clearly. I also began to dissect my posture so I could appear comfortable on camera.

I still have a lot of work to do, but the only way to get better is to do it.

Be familiar with compression.  I spent more time than I would like to admit recompressing video in Final Cut and Windows Movie Maker.  Before you begin your podcast shoot some test video and try to get the right mix of quality and size.

Be familiar with distribution options. Know that iTunes needs Quicktime video. Know how to utilize BitTorrent.  A true podcast will make the content available in whatever format their views demand.  If I were to start over, I would have done a better job and offered more options than just an iTunes and a XML feed.

Above are just a handful of suggestions.  I do recommend you check out Kelly Sutton’s work if you want someone who knows way more about video podcasting than I.

Time to put food on the table

Sean's future is in this box.

Sean's future is in this box.

Since graduating, I’ve been lucky enough to travel cross country, work for one of my favorite newspapers, and podcast my trip across Europe. But I’m done vacationing and exploring for the time being, and it is time to get to work.  I’ve struggled with what my ideal job would be.  Throughout my college career I’ve wavered between what industry I wanted to get into.  Did I like writing?  Video?  The Web?

But I’ve come to realize that I just love information and will do any job that allows me to create content in multiple forms.  This may be through personal projects such as Consumer Whore (which will get a kick in the pants in a few days) or by getting on the staff of a forward thinking newspaper.  But as of now, basic parts of my life such as of where I will work and live in the coming months are a big question mark.

If you excuse me, I have some cover letters to write.