Valentine’s Day is but a few days away, so that means that cable TV is running every romantic comedy ever. In watching 13 going on 30 for the fifth time (don’t ask) I noticed a strange trend in romantic comedies: one of the lead characters is usually a journalist. For some reason, the very same people who want to save democracy and give voice to the voiceless are most prone to falling dramatically in love with a complete stranger.

Naturally, someone had to point out this tired Hollywood plot device that seems to go unnoticed by the general public. Unfortunately for my freelance career, that someone is me. The films:

13 Going on 30

she totally takes a buyout in the sequel

Plot: During her 13th birthday party Jennifer Garner wishes she could be 30 and skip all of that messy teenage stuff.

Journalist sighting: In her 30-year-old life she is a heartless editor of some fashion magazine. In Grinch-like fashion, she corrects her errant ways and relaunches the mag to be a happy, fluffy, go- lucky magazine where everyone in New York City celebrates under a sea of confetti and general good spirits. Oh, and she miraculously remembers the entire thriller dance.

Good or bad for the industry: Good. Garner ends up tbeing responsible for the redesign instead of her ruthless friend who wanted to turn the magazine into some creepy gothic fashion magazine. Garner proves the theory that media representative of its readers will win every time.

27 Dresses

The wedding was typography-themed

Plot: Girl attends 27 weddings. Guy does story on her. They fall in love.

Journalist sighting: Cyclops plays a journalist who begins covering the wedding, but ends up focusing on Miss 27 dresses.

Good or bad for the industry: Bad. Cyclops’ editor goes and publishes the article without consent of his source and makes all journalists look like they only care about the story. Destined love be damned.

Sleepless in Seattle

No really, they were giant sized.

Plot: Guy loses wife and confesses his vulnerability on the radio. Girl hears guy on radio and is obsessed with meeting him.

Journalist sighting: The female lead, Meg Ryan works at the Baltimore Sun and begins doing a story on Tom Hanks. She ends up falling in love and saving the universe from an intergalactic space monkey.  Only half of that statement is true.

Good or bad for the industry: Bad. She falls in love with a source. An obvious example of the widowed-dad bias the media has.

How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days

I hope one day to be photoshopped leaning on my future wife, too.

Plot: Goldie Hawn Jr. is a writer at a women’s magazine and sets out to write a clever twist on the “How to please your man” story. And by clever, I mean ironic. And by ironic, I mean bad.

Journalist sighting: The female lead is the journalist once again.

Good or bad for the industry: Bad. Not only does it make reporters look like backstabbing story-hungry robots, she falls in love with the source.

Knocked Up

According to imdb the f-word is said a total of 120 times throughout the film

Plot: Guy and girl have one night stand. Girl gets pregnant. Hilarity and pot jokes ensue.

Journalist Sighting: The girl is a entertainment reporter for E! Television and is struggling to advance her career in the midst of having a baby crises.

Good or bad for the industry: Push. We all know entertainment reporters aren’t real journalists … kidding.

And More…

I have either never seen these movies,  or their status as a romantic comedy is questionable. Still, I’m pretty sure someone falls in love and a journalist is involved:

• Bridget Jones Diary
• The Devil Wears Prada
• Sex in the City
• Groundhog Day
• He’s Just Not That into You (Thanks Joe!)
• Van Wilder (Thanks Joe!)
• Never Been Kissed (Thanks Dave!)

And, yes, I’m fully aware of the lameness of this post. Procrastination does strange things.

Looks like she read another newspaper article about newspapers dying

I remember the exact moment when I decided it was time to get a job. Chris Wink and I were winding down some travels and we had to set ourselves up with a grown-up job to come home to.  So in a hostel basement we propped open the laptops and starting firing off emails to everyone who would listen. Throughout our four years at Temple and The Temple News we had amassed a respectable list of contacts and friends in the industry, and we began to ask them if they knew of any openings.  Slowly the responses came back.  The responses slowly spiraled from “Sorry, no” to “Why the hell are you trying to work for a newspaper now?”

At the same moment, a member of my family was preparing to enter college and was considering some sort of media field. As I gave him advice and pondered my own employment future, the same advice came up again and again.

1 – Don’t create content, manage it.

The sad reality is, nobody is hiring basic content creators. No one needs writers, and there are thousands of them that were just laid off that are more talented and experienced than most recent grads. No matter what happens to the industry, you can be sure that content creators will continue to be treated like pieces of meat as long as the business is suffering.  There is no scarcity in people willing to write, shoot video, or report. To further the problem for grads, there is a huge crop of veterans floating around in the talent pool while editorial staffs are getting cut daily. Yet journalism schools continue to pump out thousands of new entries into the market every year. Simple supply and demand would dictate that in the off chance someone is hiring, they are going to take the best talent for the cheapest cost. Ninety-nine percent of the time, that talent is not you.

If my younger brother came to me today and told me he wanted to do any of the jobs I listed above I would tell him to avoid being the grunt that creates the content, and instead be the person that controls it. If you step back and look at some of the most successful companies in the sphere of media, they aren’t the Philadelphia Inquirers of the world. They are the Googles or the Apples. That is, companies that organize and make sense of the huge amount of content out there and sells it to the consumer.

It may seem as if I am advocating the repurposing of content instead of the creation. Creating content is the most important function in media and journalism. But there are a large amount of people capable of doing that fighting for a very small amount of jobs. I think it behooves members of the media to either increase the amount of jobs available through entrepreneurship, or maximize the productivity and impact of the small amount of paid content creation that is happening.

2- Be prepared to be untraditional

Throughout my professional life, my friends and I mostly had the following plan: go to a good college, intern at some newspapers, make contacts at said papers, get a journalism degree, use aforementioned contacts to land entry level newspaper position. Several links in that chain have since become unreliable. As a recent grad you must be flexible in your vision of your future. Don’t be afraid to work for a small upstart news company, or a business to business publication, or a Web site.

Those in the job market willing to get outside of that traditional path will get to the new opportunities first. Sitting around and lamenting the loss of the traditional reporter job won’t help. Or, even worse, it will force you to miss some budding fixes to the journalism industry.

3- No one loves Journalists more than themselves

This was something pointed out to me by a friend during inauguration coverage. Journalists are among the most self-referential trades in the world. Industries come and go regularly. But because the media has the soapbox, you would think the end of the world was in store when a local newspaper stops printing.

For sure, there is nothing light-hearted about the loss of jobs and the end of a business. But it is disgusting how much coverage the death of newspapers receives in newspapers. Maybe I may feel this way because I have an ear out listening for such news, but the journalists-covering-journalism angle taken in many publications leads the common person to roll their eyes. Don’t get caught up in the cycle, as it doesn’t do anyone any good. Leave the stories about journalism to Romenesko and move on.

4- Multimedia won’t save journalism.

In j-school it is a common belief that journalism students will be most marketable possessing multimedia skills. For the most part that means slideshows, short videos, and flash animation. But how many of your friends family members spend more than five minutes on a  news site? Considering the amount of education and man power that goes into some multimedia presentations, the multimedia model is not practical.

Journalism students should learn multimedia for sure, but not in a dabbling capacity. It would be wise to learn one aspect of multimedia in depth so, if need be, the student could do that full time. For example. don’t just learn enough Flash to get you by, learn enough Flash to be a professional Flash animator. Most people can write and taking photographs to some capacity, and those talents have a limited application in a limited set of industries. If you learned Flash, not only can you use that talent to land a media job, you can freelance with that talent. Or create your own content. Or work for a non-media corporation, as well as being part of smaller talent pool.

Agree?

I’m aware that the above points contain an overabundance of generalities, but when we are discussing a turbulent industry’s state in four years, that is the only language this conversation can take place in. Is there anything radical or unconventional you would tell an incoming journalism class?

Many thanks to Brian James Kirk for lending ideas about this post.

Just a note to say this site (and all of my other sites) have been down the past week as I sorted out hosting issues.

More Barcamp info, freelancing news, and long drawn out blog posts to come in the next few days.

We have spell check and grammer check, but has anyone ever built an automatic AP style check?  I’m aware there are judgment calls copyeditors make that wouldn’t be able to be done by any computer.  But wouldn’t it speed up the flow of copy if things like capitalization, punctuation, and names of current newsmakers were automatically formatted?

Someone could even keep a database of names as they go in and out of the public spotlight and charge media outlets.

Gadget blog Engadget recently single handedly cost Apple $4 billion in market cap when it published a bogus email from a supposed apple insider declaring Leopard and the iPhone were being delayed. The stock quickly rebounded but the power of blogs was evident once again.

Engadget recently detailed how it all went down. I admire them for not simply sweeping this under the rug, and it allows a reader to easily forgive them.

From the post:

So we were sitting on news of obvious importance — the email was circulating, and it was enough to set off the alarms of other sources at Apple who also started forwarding it outbound. (As it happened, we were not the only site that acquired and published that memo, perhaps just the first.) Given the nature of that news, we felt we had an obligation to inform people that Apple had sent out an internal memo in preparation of a delay in the iPhone and Leopard. And so I ran the story; I believe most people in my place would have done the same.